Anticipation the epitome of obviousness?
The BPAI repeats an old canard in Ex parte Russell:
**Hence, we agree with the Examiner that Nagano renders the claimed fuel rod unpatentable. See In re Fracalossi, 681 F.2d 792, 794 (CCPA 1982) (A disclosure that anticipates under 35 U.S.C. § 102 also renders the claim unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103, for anticipation is the epitome of obviousness.)
**Hence, we agree with the Examiner that Nagano renders the claimed fuel rod unpatentable. See In re Fracalossi, 681 F.2d 792, 794 (CCPA 1982) (A disclosure that anticipates under 35 U.S.C. § 102 also renders the claim unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103, for anticipation is the epitome of obviousness.)
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 9:31 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home