Samsung loses appeal of Apple ITC case at the CAFC
Note the affirmance in Samsung v. ITC and Apple.
See also Reuters story U.S. court refuses to revive Samsung patent case against Apple
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 3:41 AM
Thursday, May 15, 2014
Note the affirmance in Samsung v. ITC and Apple.
See also Reuters story U.S. court refuses to revive Samsung patent case against Apple
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- Forbes on patent pools
- Forbes on "the clear blue line"
- Kappos ridicules idea that "patent system is broken"
- "60 Minutes" on May 11, 2014
- Octane, Highmark cases
- How would the Bass/Tuschl dispute be resolved unde...
- The recusals by Judge Rader
- Amazon's US 8,676,056
- GE wins wind turbine inventorship case: "without c...
- Roslin Institute loses Dolly the Sheep case at CAFC
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home